From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752163Ab0CAWbn (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:31:43 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:60898 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087Ab0CAWbl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:31:41 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8C4032.7080703@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:31:14 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zachary Amsden CC: Gleb Natapov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com Subject: Re: use of setjmp/longjmp in x86 emulator. References: <20100301091819.GD16909@redhat.com> <4B8BE7C1.40000@redhat.com> <20100301174724.GA12867@redhat.com> <4B8C09F5.9070506@redhat.com> <20100301190341.GD12867@redhat.com> <4B8C1320.6060602@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B8C1320.6060602@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2010 11:18 AM, Zachary Amsden wrote: > > It's going to be ugly to emulate segmentation, NX and write protect > support without hardware to do this checking for you, but it's just what > you have to do in this slow path - tedious, fully specified emulation. > > Just because it's tedious doesn't mean we need to use setjmp / longjmp. > Throw / catch might be effective, but it's still pretty bizarre to do > tricks like that in C. > Well, setjmp/longjmp really is not much more than exception handling in C. -hpa