From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Denis Chapligin <chollya@satgate.net>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "S.H. Verbrugge" <ief@soleus.nu>
Subject: Re: domU network slowdown with new dom0 kernel
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:52:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8C5334.8060502@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100301145724.19f92bc9@biker.satgate.net>
On 03/01/2010 04:57 AM, Denis Chapligin wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a domU that acts as iSCSI target for our network. It was running
> on the host with xen 3.4.2 and original XenLinux (2.6.18) kernel. Today
> i've tried to replace old 2.6.18 kernel with a latest (stable/master)
> pvops kernel. The problem, is that when i replaced dom0 kernel, network
> performance of domU mentioned above dropped and networking with this
> domU become totaly unusable. In domU's dmesg i see the following
> entries:
>
> [ 1785.260012] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1785.260036] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1785.810612] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1785.810612] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.310061] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.310081] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.550007] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.550024] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.970010] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1786.970025] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1792.840010] __ratelimit: 6 callbacks suppressed
> [ 1792.840035] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1792.840049] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1798.310016] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1798.310045] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1799.230013] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1799.230036] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1799.550009] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1799.550031] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1800.110352] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1800.110352] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1800.350020] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
> [ 1800.350050] net eth0: rx->offset: 0, size: 4294967295
>
> in dom0's dmesg i see nothing interesting. I've tried several kernels
> and found that domU could use any kernel, but dom0 kernel version is
> critical and it only works with xen 2.6.18 kernel.
>
> I have 6 xen hosts, but only this domU is problematic. The domU above is
> very high loaded and installed on host with 4x1GB ethernet card,
> combined into single etherchannel. All other domU's on other hosts
> and this host aren't affected and use only 1 NIC and they're
> bandwidth usage usually not more than 10-15% of that NIC. The
> problematic domU uses up to 80% of combined bandwidth.
>
> So, what i'm doing wrong and how can i fix this issue? :)
>
>
Is this with a freshly checked out version of xen.git? I committed some
bugfixes to netback last week, which may have caused problems.
J
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-01 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-01 12:57 domU network slowdown with new dom0 kernel Denis Chapligin
2010-03-01 23:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8C5334.8060502@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=chollya@satgate.net \
--cc=ief@soleus.nu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.