From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B8C5843.1080907@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:13:55 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4B757217.3060406@domain.hid> <4B757306.5070102@domain.hid> <4B7575B9.2060707@domain.hid> <4B757BC8.7020305@domain.hid> <4B75802B.1030900@domain.hid> <4B7581FF.4040304@domain.hid> <4B75C4C4.70406@domain.hid> <4B85272C.5000006@domain.hid> <4B8532CA.8020808@domain.hid> <4B8BC874.40309@domain.hid> <4B8BC8ED.5010105@domain.hid> <4B8BC996.20009@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <4B8BC996.20009@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Yet another ((weak)) bug List-Id: Xenomai life and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>>>>> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>>>>>> Am 12.02.2010 17:22, schrieb Jan Kiszka: >>>>>>>> libxnskin or so? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> libxenomai ? >>>>>> Ok. Let's go for libxenomai. I will try and do that in the next few days. >>>>>> >>>>> Already had a chance to look into this? >>>> No. I was off a few days. I just looked at it in the train, but could >>>> not test it yet. >>> If there is anything I can do to help accelerating it, please let me >>> know. We need to bake a new Xenomai package this week for our customer, >>> and at some point I need to decide between upstream and my temporary >>> fix. Upstream is generally preferred - if available. >> Yes, I have been a bit delayed, but should handle this this week, so as >> to be ready for a release next week-end. > > Anything in some private branch already? Ok. Everything pushed. It works on ARM and x86. I have not tested in the multilib and/or dlopen case, so please test it if you can. > > Jan > -- Gilles.