From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ns: Syscalls for better namespace sharing control.
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:03:43 +0300
Message-ID: <4B8D28CF.8060304@parallels.com>
References: <4B4F24AC.70105@trash.net> <m13a0tf17t.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <1266875729.3673.12.camel@bigi> <m1wry46es9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <1266931623.3973.643.camel@bigi> <m1iq9ocafv.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <1266934817.3973.654.camel@bigi> <m1r5obbu2w.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <1266966581.3973.675.camel@bigi> <m1pr3t2fvl.fsf_-_@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B883987.6090408@parallels.com> <m1bpfbwuze.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B883E6F.1060907@parallels.com> <m13a0nwu6p.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B88D80A.8010701@parallels.com> <m1mxyvrqvk.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B88E431.6040609@parallels.com> <m1bpfbqajn.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B894564.7080104@parallels.com> <m1iq9io5sc.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B89727C.9040602@parallels.com> <m1ljeempk6.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <4B8AE8C1.1030305@free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>, hadi@cyberus.ca,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:23850 "EHLO relay.sw.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753816Ab0CBPEv (ORCPT <rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:04:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4B8AE8C1.1030305@free.fr>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

> I agree with all the points you and Pavel you talked about but I don't 
> feel comfortable to have the current process to switch the pid namespace 
> because of the process tree hierarchy (what will be the parent of the 
> process when you enter the pid namespace for example).

The answer is - the one, that used to be. I see no problems with it.
Do you?