From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Re: [GIT PULL] pv/fbfront Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:32:14 -0800 Message-ID: <4B8D9FFE.8080704@goop.org> References: <20100302030113.GA881@phenom.dumpdata.com> <4B8D6EF7.8090309@goop.org> <20100302215647.GB29262@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100302215647.GB29262@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/02/2010 01:56 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > No. But xen/stable does. Without those patches virgin xen/stable boots, > but on Dom0 console I see: > > (XEN) mm.c:859:d1008 Error getting mfn 1c1f5 (pfn 5555555555555555) from > L1 entry 800000001c1f5467 for l1e_owner=1008, pg_owner=3273 > > these forever. > I haven't seen that, but I've merged xen/next into stable now, so it should have picked up those changes. >> BTW, I can't get absolute (tablet) mode working with pvfb any more. >> Have you noticed that? >> > Noted. Haven't played with that - I just boot up tiny guests (20MB or > so) that can simple stuff. I will look in this. > I've been running 512MB domains with (fairly) clean F12 installs in them (32 and 64b, pv and hvm). J