From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: Wolfgang Mauerer <wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid>,
xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>,
Gernot Hillier <gernot.hillier@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Potential heap corruption on thread cleanup
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:16:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8E28D2.6020808@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8E281F.1040308@domain.hid>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> Hi Gilles,
>>>
>>> I'm pushing your findings to the list, also as my colleagues showed
>>> strong interest - this thing may explain rare corruptions for us as well.
>>>
>>> I thought a bit about that likely u_mode-related crash in your test case
>>> and have the following theory so far: If the xeno_current_mode storage
>>> is allocated on the application heap (!HAVE_THREAD, that's also what we
>>> are forced to use), it is automatically freed on thread termination in
>>> the context of the dying thread. If the thread is already migrated to
>>> secondary or if that happens while it is cleaned up (i.e. before calling
>>> for exit into the kernel), there is no problem, Xenomai will not touch
>>> the mode storage anymore. But if the thread happens to delete the
>>> storage "silently", without any migration, the final exit will trigger
>>> one further access. And that takes place against an invalid head area at
>>> this point.
>>>
>>> Does this make sense?
>> Yes, it is the issue we observed.
>>
>>> If that is true, all we need to do is to force a migration before
>>> releasing the mode storage. Could you check this?
>> No, that does not fly. Calling, for instance, __wrap_pthread_mutex_lock
>> in another TSD cleanup function is which could be called after the
>> current_mode TSD cleanup is allowed and could trigger a switch to
>> primary mode and a write to the u_mode.
>>
>
> Good point. Mmh. Another, but ABI-breaking, way would be to add a
> syscall for deregistering the u_mode pointer...
That is the thing we did to verify that we had this bug. But this
syscall would be also called too soon, and suffers from the TSD cleanup
functions order again.
--
Gilles.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 8:58 [Xenomai-core] Potential heap corruption on thread cleanup Jan Kiszka
2010-03-03 9:04 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-03-03 9:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-03 9:16 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2010-03-04 18:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-04 18:36 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-03-04 20:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-04 20:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-03-05 11:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-05 11:30 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-03-05 11:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-05 11:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2010-03-05 11:45 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-03-05 11:08 ` Wolfgang Mauerer
2010-03-05 11:29 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8E28D2.6020808@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=gernot.hillier@domain.hid \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=wolfgang.mauerer@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.