From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:55:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8E8677.8060003@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvdde62ai.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
> Traditionally the right way to do this has been to make a temporary commit
> on the branch, i.e.
I would like to avoid such commits for unfinished content updates. Should the
storage operation be provided by the stash instead for intermediate work results?
Will it happen to forget corresponding clean-up for "temporary" changes that
might be committed too early just to get them stored?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-01 18:50 Better cooperation between checkouts and stashing Markus Elfring
2010-02-01 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-01 21:57 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-01 22:44 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-02-02 1:36 ` Petr Baudis
2010-02-02 10:26 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-02 11:04 ` Petr Baudis
2010-02-09 19:20 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-09 20:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-09 21:01 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-18 17:43 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-18 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-27 21:33 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-27 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-28 13:55 ` Markus Elfring
2010-02-28 22:57 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 10:50 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-01 17:02 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 17:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-01 18:14 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-01 18:29 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-01 19:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-01 21:20 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 1:41 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-02 9:35 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 17:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-03 15:55 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2010-03-04 7:46 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-04 19:55 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 9:45 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-02 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-03 16:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 16:35 ` [PATCH] Clarification for the command "git checkout <branch>" Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 16:44 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-17 17:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17 18:21 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-17 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-17 18:50 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-17 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-18 10:11 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-18 16:36 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-18 17:19 ` Michael Witten
2010-03-18 17:33 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-19 8:28 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-19 17:17 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-03-20 6:00 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-19 8:15 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-30 15:57 ` Markus Elfring
2010-03-30 22:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-03-31 3:58 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-04-01 4:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-01 13:09 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2010-04-01 6:38 ` Markus Elfring
2010-04-10 13:30 ` Markus Elfring
2010-04-10 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8E8677.8060003@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mfwitten@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.