All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mahesh Siddheshwar <siddheshwar.mahesh-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
To: Tom Tucker
	<tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>,
	Vu Pham <vuhuong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	ewg-G2znmakfqn7U1rindQTSdQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: nfsrdma fails to write big file,
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:26:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8EC600.9050101@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B89EF88.1030903-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>

Hi Tom, Vu,

Tom Tucker wrote:
> Roland Dreier wrote:
>>  > +               /*  > +                * Add room for frmr 
>> register and invalidate WRs
>>  > +                * Requests sometimes have two chunks, each chunk
>>  > +                * requires to have different frmr. The safest
>>  > +                * WRs required are max_send_wr * 6; however, we
>>  > +                * get send completions and poll fast enough, it
>>  > +                * is pretty safe to have max_send_wr * 4.  > 
>> +                */
>>  > +               ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 4;
>>
>> Seems like a bad design if there is a possibility of work queue
>> overflow; if you're counting on events occurring in a particular order
>> or completions being handled "fast enough", then your design is going to
>> fail in some high load situations, which I don't think you want.   
>
> Vu,
>
> Would you please try the following:
>
> - Set the multiplier to 5
While trying to test this between a Linux client and Solaris server,
I made the following changes in :
/usr/src/ofa_kernel-1.5.1/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/verbs.c

diff verbs.c.org verbs.c
653c653
<               ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 3;
---
 >               ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr *= 8;
685c685
<       ep->rep_cqinit = ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr/2 /*  - 1*/;
---
 >       ep->rep_cqinit = ep->rep_attr.cap.max

(I bumped it to 8)

did make install. 

On reboot I see the errors on NFS READs as opposed to WRITEs
as seen before, when I try to read a 10G file from the server.

The client is running: RHEL 5.3 (2.6.18-128.el5PAE) with
OFED-1.5.1-20100223-0740 bits. The client has an Sun IB
HCA: SUN0070130001, MT25418, 2.7.0 firmware, hw_rev = a0.
The server is running Solaris based on snv_128.

rpcdebug output from the client:

==
RPC:    85 call_bind (status 0)
RPC:    85 call_connect xprt ec78d800 is connected
RPC:    85 call_transmit (status 0)
RPC:    85 xprt_prepare_transmit
RPC:    85 xprt_cwnd_limited cong = 0 cwnd = 8192
RPC:    85 rpc_xdr_encode (status 0)
RPC:    85 marshaling UNIX cred eddb4dc0
RPC:    85 using AUTH_UNIX cred eddb4dc0 to wrap rpc data
RPC:    85 xprt_transmit(164)
RPC:       rpcrdma_inline_pullup: pad 0 destp 0xf1dd1410 len 164 hdrlen 164
RPC:       rpcrdma_register_frmr_external: Using frmr ec7da920 to map 4 
segments
RPC:       rpcrdma_create_chunks: write chunk elem 
16384@0x38536d000:0xa601 (more)
RPC:       rpcrdma_register_frmr_external: Using frmr ec7da960 to map 1 
segments
RPC:       rpcrdma_create_chunks: write chunk elem 108@0x31dd153c:0xaa01 
(last)
RPC:       rpcrdma_marshal_req: write chunk: hdrlen 68 rpclen 164 padlen 
0 headerp 0xf1dd124c base 0xf1dd136c lkey 0x500
RPC:    85 xmit complete
RPC:    85 sleep_on(queue "xprt_pending" time 4683109)
RPC:    85 added to queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC:    85 setting alarm for 60000 ms
RPC:       wake_up_next(ec78d944 "xprt_resend")
RPC:       wake_up_next(ec78d8f4 "xprt_sending")
RPC:       rpcrdma_qp_async_error_upcall: QP error 3 on device mlx4_0 ep 
ec78db40
RPC:    85 __rpc_wake_up_task (now 4683110)
RPC:    85 disabling timer
RPC:    85 removed from queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC:       __rpc_wake_up_task done
RPC:    85 __rpc_execute flags=0x1
RPC:    85 call_status (status -107)
RPC:    85 call_bind (status 0)
RPC:    85 call_connect xprt ec78d800 is not connected
RPC:    85 xprt_connect xprt ec78d800 is not connected
RPC:    85 sleep_on(queue "xprt_pending" time 4683110)
RPC:    85 added to queue ec78d994 "xprt_pending"
RPC:    85 setting alarm for 60000 ms
RPC:       rpcrdma_event_process: event rep ec116800 status 5 opcode 80 
length 2493606
RPC:       rpcrdma_event_process: recv WC status 5, connection lost
RPC:       rpcrdma_conn_upcall: disconnected: ec78dbccI4:20049 (ep 
0xec78db40 event 0xa)
RPC:       rpcrdma_conn_upcall: disconnected
rpcrdma: connection to ec78dbccI4:20049 closed (-103)
RPC:       xprt_rdma_connect_worker: reconnect
==

On the server I see:

Mar  3 17:45:16 elena-ar hermon: [ID 271130 kern.notice] NOTICE: 
hermon0: Device Error: CQE remote access error
Mar  3 17:45:16 elena-ar nfssrv: [ID 819430 kern.notice] NOTICE: NFS: 
bad sendreply
Mar  3 17:45:21 elena-ar hermon: [ID 271130 kern.notice] NOTICE: 
hermon0: Device Error: CQE remote access error
Mar  3 17:45:21 elena-ar nfssrv: [ID 819430 kern.notice] NOTICE: NFS: 
bad sendreply

The remote access error is actually seen on RDMA_WRITE.
Doing some more debug on the server with DTrace, I see that
the destination address and length matches the write chunk
element in the Linux debug output above.


  0   9385                  rib_write:entry daddr 38536d000, len 4000, 
hdl a601
  0   9358         rib_init_sendwait:return ffffff44a715d308
  1   9296       rib_svc_scq_handler:return 1f7
  1   9356              rib_sendwait:return 14
  1   9386                 rib_write:return 14

^^^ that is RDMA_FAILED in 

  1  63295    xdrrdma_send_read_data:return 0
  1   5969              xdr_READ3res:return
  1   5969              xdr_READ3res:return 0

Is this a variation of the previously discussed issue or something new?

Thanks,
Mahesh

> - Set the number of buffer credits small as follows "echo 4 > 
> /proc/sys/sunrpc/rdma_slot_table_entries"
> - Rerun your test and see if you can reproduce the problem?
>
> I did the above and was unable to reproduce, but I would like to see 
> if you can to convince ourselves that 5 is the right number.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>>  - R.
>>   
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-03 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-22 18:41 nfsrdma fails to write big file, Vu Pham
     [not found] ` <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F02662E58-SDnKeQl2TTymvrjiD8yIlgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-22 18:49   ` [ewg] " Tom Tucker
2010-02-22 20:22     ` Vu Pham
2010-02-24 18:56       ` Vu Pham
     [not found]         ` <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F02663166-SDnKeQl2TTymvrjiD8yIlgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-24 19:06           ` Roland Dreier
     [not found]             ` <ada3a0q1mje.fsf-BjVyx320WGW9gfZ95n9DRSW4+XlvGpQz@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-24 22:13               ` Tom Tucker
2010-02-28  4:22               ` Tom Tucker
2010-03-02  0:19                 ` Vu Pham
     [not found]                   ` <9FA59C95FFCBB34EA5E42C1A8573784F02663602-SDnKeQl2TTymvrjiD8yIlgC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-02  3:17                     ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]                 ` <4B89EF88.1030903-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-03 20:26                   ` Mahesh Siddheshwar [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <4B8EC600.9050101-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-03 22:52                       ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]                         ` <4B8EE813.2010205-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-04 16:43                           ` Mahesh Siddheshwar
2010-02-24 22:07           ` Tom Tucker
2010-02-24 22:48           ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]             ` <4B85ACD2.9040405-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-25  0:02               ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]                 ` <4B85BDF9.8020009-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-25  0:51                   ` Tom Tucker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B8EC600.9050101@sun.com \
    --to=siddheshwar.mahesh-xsfywfwiy+m@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ewg-G2znmakfqn7U1rindQTSdQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rdreier-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=vuhuong-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.