From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
Subject: Re: miscellaneous netfilter questions
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:37:38 +0100
Message-ID: <4B8FC5B2.1090201@chello.at>
References: <20100303165419.87692fvlklxfna68@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de>	 <4B8E94F7.4080908@plouf.fr.eu.org> <1267697943.22478.17.camel@etppc09.garching.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply-To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1267697943.22478.17.camel@etppc09.garching.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

On 04.03.2010 11:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi Pascal.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your detailed answers :)
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:57 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>> Packets processed with the NOTRACK target have the UNTRACKED state.
> Ah, nice,... this is not described in the manpage (at least not in
> Debian's 1.4.6 package of iptables).
> Perhaps one should add this?

http://markmail.org/message/wwgycjd7o42k7dod

has been ignored, or overseen...


Best regards

Mart