From: Michael Weissenbacher <mw@dermichi.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS hang during xfs_fsr run
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:04:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B90C935.4070008@dermichi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100304222611.GK14317@discord.disaster>
> If you've got the inode numbers, then your running with the verbose
> flag set? Do you still have the logs for those inodes that it hung
> on?
Yes I am running xfs_fsr with the -v flag. But I'm not 100% sure if the
log was truncated since it resides in /var which locked up. Here are the
last log entries before the oopses:
ino=134269708 (this inode was /var/log/xfs_fsr.log)
(hang)
...
ino=277040401 (this inode was /var/spool/imap/x/user/xxxx/cyrus.cache)
(hang)
I can pin down those things at the moment:
- Both times it was a "hot" file - in one case a logfile, in the other
case a database file.
- Usually it should say "file busy" and continue but sometimes it
doesn't and just hangs the filesystem + oopses the kernel.
- It happens randomly, if i rerun xfs_fsr after the hang it usually goes
over the "problem" file without a hickup.
- On /var/log/xfs_fsr.log it hung even though the (+f) chattr was set.
> xfs_fsr doesn't do directory traversals to find files for defrag -
> it uses more efficient bulkstat+open-by-handle method to visit every
> inode in the filesystem once. As a result, it will still open inodes
> that have the nodefrag flag set on them, but will then ignore them once
> it finds the flag is set.
Yes, usually it says "marked as don't defrag, ignoring" but this one
time it hung.
> A trace would tell us which one it was....
Will see that i can get another one.
cheers,
Michael
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 10:10 XFS hang during xfs_fsr run Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-04 11:20 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-04 12:08 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-04 13:15 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-04 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-04 14:20 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-04 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-04 17:14 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-04 22:26 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-05 9:04 ` Michael Weissenbacher [this message]
2010-03-06 21:20 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-08 0:06 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-08 12:17 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-08 18:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-09 9:14 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-09 11:38 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-09 12:09 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-10 8:46 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-11 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-12 9:45 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-12 10:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-12 10:36 ` Michael Weissenbacher
2010-03-12 11:56 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-12 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-13 0:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-04-16 8:10 ` Michael Monnerie
2010-04-16 10:50 ` Michael Weissenbacher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B90C935.4070008@dermichi.com \
--to=mw@dermichi.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.