From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B92E18D.2090305@manicmethod.com> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:13:17 -0500 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eamon Walsh CC: Daniel J Walsh , SELinux Subject: Re: updated libselinux pkgconfig does not work correctly on lib64 machines. References: <4B857CDE.7010303@redhat.com> <4B857F6B.7050503@redhat.com> <4B872798.4010702@manicmethod.com> <4B880E8D.5070602@tycho.nsa.gov> <4B8825C2.3030107@redhat.com> <4B882E69.7070407@tycho.nsa.gov> In-Reply-To: <4B882E69.7070407@tycho.nsa.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Eamon Walsh wrote: > On 02/26/2010 02:49 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 02/26/2010 01:10 PM, Eamon Walsh wrote: >> >>> On 02/25/2010 08:44 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 02/24/2010 02:24 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>>>> Ignore the first patch it was missing pc.in files. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I am completely new to libtool. Does this seem reasonable Eamon? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I don't see any reference to "lib64" anywhere in our Makefiles even with >>> the patch. We have "lib" hard-coded, and I just checked a 64-bit >>> machine and our stuff is in /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib64. Is that >>> what this patch is trying to solve? >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Yes >> >> If you execute >> >> make LIBDIR=/usr/lib64 SHLIBDIR=/lib64 install >> >> It should do the right thing with the patch. >> >> This is what the spec file hands in. >> > > OK, that makes sense. > > The patch contains a stray line involving adding -fPIC to CFLAGS. I > don't think that was meant to be part of this patch. > > Otherwise, > > Acked-by: Eamon Walsh > > Merged in libselinux 2.0.92 -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.