From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miguel Aguilar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ASoC: DaVinci: CQ93VC Voice Codec Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:26:47 -0600 Message-ID: <4B953357.9080904@ridgerun.com> References: <1264095660-1323-1-git-send-email-miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com> <20100125111104.GC22909@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.navvo.net (mail.navvo.net [74.208.67.6]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FB62454C for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:30:56 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20100125111104.GC22909@sirena.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, nsekhar@ti.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Mark, What is the status of this patch series?, I'm still missing the change pointed below for third patch. Regards, Miguel Aguilar Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:41:00AM -0600, miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com wrote: > >> +static __init int cq93vc_codec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ > > ... > >> + cq93vc_codec = codec; >> + >> + ret = snd_soc_register_dai(&cq93vc_dai); >> + if (ret != 0) { >> + dev_err(davinci_vc->dev, "could register dai\n"); >> + goto fail1; >> + } >> + return 0; > > There should also be a snd_soc_register_codec() before this, and > similarly on the remove. Otherwise this looks good.