From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Re: Weird Issue with raid 5+0 Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: <4B95A0F5.6090500@goop.org> References: <31e44a111002202033m4a9dfba9yf8aef62b8b39933a@mail.gmail.com> <20100221164805.5bdc2d60@notabene.brown> <31e44a111002202326x407c814dsaa60e51a8a0ff049@mail.gmail.com> <20100221191640.39b68b01@notabene.brown> <20100308165021.6529fe6d@notabene.brown> <31e44a111003080735t4ddf7c63uaa517ad6522cca67@mail.gmail.com> <4B9587B2.5050700@goop.org> <31e44a111003081648uf0b7af2o2ece4ffbff80c749@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <31e44a111003081648uf0b7af2o2ece4ffbff80c749@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: chris Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Neil Brown , Xen-Devel List List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 03/08/2010 04:48 PM, chris wrote: > I will test with xenlinux 2.6.18, as far as pv_ops dom0 does this work > with any version of the hypervisor? The current system is running 3.2 > which is pretty old so I just assumed pv_ops wouldn't be a > possibility. > I'm not sure - it's worth trying ;). xen/next / stable-2.6.32.x explicitly requires 4.0 or 3.4.3, but I don't know what the earliest working version is for xen/master / stable-2.6.31.x. J