From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:38:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268101394.10871.1861.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 10:11 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 15:32 +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
>
>>> This sounds like the compiler may have screwed up again. Can you compile
>>> with this patch and see if it catches anything?
>>>
>> But I was using a x86_64 machine, and this patch won't do anything on
>> x86_64?
>
> I wonder if this issue has crept to x86_64. What kind of dump do you
> get? And if this segfault is in the kernel, could you see (using gdb on
> a vmlinux) if any of the stack frame setups look peculiar?
>
The segfault is from userspace. This is a segfault I just got:
ftrace_stack_ma[14989]: segfault at fe2e ip 00000000004474c0 sp 00007fffb97e38c0 error 4 in bash[400000+d1000]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-09 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 6:04 2.6.33: ftrace triggers soft lockup Américo Wang
2010-03-03 13:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 2:58 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 1:33 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-04 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 3:01 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-04 4:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 5:10 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-04 5:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-04 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 4:14 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 7:16 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-05 15:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 18:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-05 18:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-05 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 7:32 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-08 15:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 2:11 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-09 2:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 3:38 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2010-03-12 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 2:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 5:37 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-13 5:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-14 16:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-13 17:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 1:46 ` Li Zefan
2010-03-15 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-15 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-08 2:31 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:40 ` Américo Wang
2010-03-09 2:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-03-09 5:06 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B95C2AF.7010508@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.