From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:33:35 -0800 Message-ID: <4B991B5F.6050302@zytor.com> References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> <4B97C6A5.4010209@tvk.rwth-aachen.de> <17BB1CC0-9B13-401D-B6AA-90365208A042@mit.edu> <201003111927.24829.knikanth@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201003111927.24829.knikanth@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nikanth Karthikesan Cc: Theodore Tso , Damian Lukowski , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , Jeff Garzik , Matthew Wilcox , "Martin K. Petersen" , James Bottomley , Tejun Heo , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Mark Lord , hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, aschnell@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2010 05:57 AM, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote: > > I guess, what he meant was, to keep filesystem blocks aligned, even if the > partition is not. Say if the partition is mis-aligned by 512-bytes, let the > filesystem waste 4k-512bytes and keep it's blocks aligned. But it might be a > case of over-engineering, possibly requiring disk format change. > That's basically what you end up having to do for FAT filesystems to be aligned. -hpa