From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:22:18 -0800
Message-ID: <4B9ABE9A.1040407@goop.org>
References: <516578.30217.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <516578.30217.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/12/2010 02:13 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Yes. That's what i see on my box.
>

OK, over to you Stefano.  Why is Boris seeing an instacrash in dom0 with 
your patches in place?

     J

>
> Boris.
>
> --- On *Fri, 3/12/10, Jeremy Fitzhardinge /<jeremy@goop.org>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
>     Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen
>     To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
>     Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
>     <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Sheng Yang"
>     <sheng@linux.intel.com>, "Stefano Stabellini"
>     <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>     Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 5:11 PM
>
>     On 03/12/2010 02:08 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>     > Yes.
>     > I can load 2.6.32.9 ( been built via xen/stable just now) under
>     then most recent Xen 4.0 (matching tip CS Xen's rpms have been
>     rebuilt and reinstalled on F12 following Michael Young ) via clone
>     of original xen-unstable tree patched per Steffano :-
>     >
>     http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-03/msg00452.html
>     >
>
>     Are you saying that a patched Xen with unpatched dom0 does not
>     crash, but patched dom0 does crash?
>
>         J
>
>