From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: A clocksource question Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:30:08 -0800 Message-ID: <4B9BE7C0.2070401@goop.org> References: <4B962748.90609@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B9A8FDE.8070506@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B9AB126.1070406@goop.org> <201003122256.02254.tobias.geiger@vido.info> <4B9AB9FE.8070601@goop.org> <4B9AABB9.7030906@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B9AAE6A.6050801@invisiblethingslab.com> <4B9AD2DD.90907@goop.org> <4B9B61CD.80401@invisiblethingslab.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B9B61CD.80401@invisiblethingslab.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Joanna Rutkowska Cc: Tobias Geiger , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/13/2010 01:58 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote: > In the meantime found a similar thread on KVM: > http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg22925.html > > and also a patch suggested there: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg23491.html > > Don't have time to try the patch right now, but courious to hear your > opinion in the meantime... > I was just looking at that logic yesterday and was approaching a similar conclusion, so I'm glad Marcelo sorted it out. It looks like a variant of that patch got into 2.6.33 (41d2e4949377) , so I'll look at backporting it. Actually it's probably -stable material. J