All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sys_umount() returns EBUSY when doing: sh -c "mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt;  umount /mnt"
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:21:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9D0D1E.3010404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38b2ab8a1003130056u4b025839i556a797ccad894de@mail.gmail.com>

On 03/13/2010 02:56 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
> Hello
>
> I've some shell scripts which try to find out the filesystem hosted by
> a block device.
>
> They basically do this:
>
>      mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt
>      fs=$(stat -f -c %T $mount_point)
>      umount /mnt
>
> It happens to work but since an unknown upgrade (kernel, libs or tools
> upgrade), umount(8) returns -EBUSY.
>
> I found that it's actually the sys_umount() which return -EBUSY.
>
> So the question, is this expected or is this a regression ?
>
> If it's expected then which operation should I add between the
> mount(8) and umount(8) to make the mount operation completely finish
> (inside the kernel) so the next umount won't return -EBUSY ?

If no other process were involved I would say it's likely a bug. 
However, my guess is that some other process (HAL, something in GNOME, 
etc.) detects the mount and decides to start accessing the drive. Then 
when you immediately try to unmount, it fails because it's busy. I 
suspect if you try this in single-user mode with no unnecessary 
processes running you won't see this.

>
> Oh I'm currently using the kernel shipped with F12: 2.6.32.9-67.fc12.x86_64
>
> Thanks


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-03-14 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-13  8:56 sys_umount() returns EBUSY when doing: sh -c "mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt; umount /mnt" Francis Moreau
2010-03-13 20:30 ` Francis Moreau
2010-03-15 16:04   ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-15 16:34     ` Al Viro
2010-03-15 20:23       ` Francis Moreau
2010-03-16  6:53       ` Ian Kent
2010-03-15 20:19     ` Francis Moreau
2010-03-14 16:21 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2010-03-15 12:09   ` Francis Moreau
2010-03-16 11:06     ` Petr Uzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B9D0D1E.3010404@gmail.com \
    --to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=francis.moro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.