From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:42:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.193]:54187 "EHLO tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1492528Ab0CNXmC (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:42:02 +0100 Received: from relay21.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.50]) by tyo201.gate.nec.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id o2ENfpXA000829; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:41:56 +0900 (JST) Received: from realmbox31.aps.necel.com ([10.29.19.32] [10.29.19.32]) by relay21.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:41:55 +0900 Received: from [10.114.181.193] ([10.114.181.193] [10.114.181.193]) by mbox02.aps.necel.com with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:41:55 +0900 Message-ID: <4B9D744A.5080301@necel.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:42:02 +0900 From: Shinya Kuribayashi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wuzhangjin@gmail.com CC: Ralf Baechle , Greg KH , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Loongson-2F: Flush the branch target history such as BTB and RAS References: <4B98632E.70806@necel.com> <20100311095944.GC18065@linux-mips.org> <1268452341.21443.3.camel@falcon> In-Reply-To: <1268452341.21443.3.camel@falcon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 26229 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: shinya.kuribayashi@necel.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips Wu Zhangjin wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 10:59 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:27:42PM +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote: >> >>> Are you sure that RAS represents "Row Address Strobe", not "Return >>> Address Stack?" > > This should be Return Address Stack. > > Will resend this patch later. Thanks for the head's up. -- Shinya Kuribayashi NEC Electronics