From: bgat@billgatliff.com (Bill Gatliff)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral Multiplexing) in linux
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:52:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9E2D7E.1020702@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9DC239.90407@st.com>
Shiraz HASHIM wrote:
>
> I think the problem is we cannot change the standard drivers (already in the
> mainline). So if the standard driver doesn't support this in its probe, then
> how should we manage this?
>
> Further these configurations are board dependent, so I think driver must be
> independent of this.
>
What I think you really want is for your board-specific code (or some
helper code elsewhere in your mach-* directory) to do the pin
assignments, and the drivers just assume that the pins are all right.
That's the approach used in OMAP2 and AT91, among others, and it seems
to work out just fine.
If you assume that the driver "just knows" what the multiplexer settings
need to be, then sooner or later that same peripheral gets used in a
different SoC and that assumption has to get tossed out. That's
happening some with the AT91 drivers that can also be used on AVR32
chips. Best to avoid that extra work by putting the platform-specific
knowledge where it belongs: in the platform-specific code.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
Embedded systems training and consulting
http://billgatliff.com
bgat at billgatliff.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-15 4:31 QUERY: How to handle SOC Configuration (Peripheral Multiplexing) in linux Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 4:47 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 5:14 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 5:41 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 6:32 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 6:46 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:55 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 13:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 13:22 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-16 2:01 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 12:52 ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2010-03-15 16:02 ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 16:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-03-15 16:53 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 17:09 ` Mark Brown
2010-03-15 18:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2010-03-15 18:58 ` Bill Gatliff
2010-03-15 16:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 4:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15 5:15 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 5:28 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-03-15 6:34 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 6:20 ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-15 6:28 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 8:42 ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 9:09 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 9:37 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 10:22 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 10:34 ` jassi brar
2010-03-15 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-03-15 10:10 ` Armando VISCONTI
2010-03-15 10:27 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-15 7:06 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-17 16:30 ` Ben Dooks
2010-03-19 4:45 ` Viresh KUMAR
2010-03-15 17:55 ` Linus Walleij
2010-03-16 13:39 ` Shiraz HASHIM
2010-03-16 21:55 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9E2D7E.1020702@billgatliff.com \
--to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.