From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from p3plsmtpa01-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.82.87]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NrAls-00037t-88 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:55:54 +0100 Received: (qmail 13273 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 13:46:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.242.7.187) by p3plsmtpa01-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.87) with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2010 13:46:08 -0000 Message-ID: <4B9E3A1E.2090008@mwester.net> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:46:06 -0500 From: Mike Westerhof User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <201003081300.19058.holger+oe@freyther.de> <201003081351.35463.holger+oe@freyther.de> <201003150446.26284.holger+oe@freyther.de> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.167.82.87 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@mwester.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: samba-essential upgrade or remove? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:55:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Koen Kooi wrote: > I think samba-essential reason of being can be done in regular samba > recipes by putting some better thought in PACKAGES and FILES. So: delete > this. No, the necessary incantations must be done in the configure stage, so that the generated binaries do not have so many dependencies. The size problem is not limited to the samba packages themselves; a very significant part of the issue are the external dependencies. -Mike (mwester)