From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Chou Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:27:10 +0800 Message-ID: <4B9F24BE.3070401@wytron.com.tw> References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> <201003100046.24695.arnd@arndb.de> <1158166a1003100114j6ea329fbh84bfad65dcac90bf@mail.gmail.com> <4B9EED55.10201@kernel.org> <1268720060.21384.10.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1268720060.21384.10.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Tejun Heo , Denys Vlasenko , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord , tytso@mit.edu, "H. Peter Anvin" , hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox , aschnell@suse.de, knikanth@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On 03/16/2010 02:14 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > The big problem is that 99% of the x86 systems out there still use the > ancient msdos label for their boot disks, so aligning H/S going forwards > will give us a nice "just works" for x86 boxes. > > The key issue is not "just work", but "performance". When unaligned, the write performance can be lower than 50% of the expected rate. - Thomas