From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NrufT-0003q7-Df for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:56:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45518 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrufS-0003pt-W6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:56:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrufS-0006MJ-A5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:56:18 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([75.149.56.221]:41642) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NrufR-0006MD-Jh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:56:18 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA0ED8C.8000404@twiddle.net> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:56:12 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] tcg-hppa: Finish the port. References: <6880f84577b97d0334b95f6ce031e61c65c2e88b.1268754659.git.rth@twiddle.net> <20100317015829.GC23195@zubnet.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100317015829.GC23195@zubnet.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stuart Brady Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 03/16/2010 06:58 PM, Stuart Brady wrote: > The tcg_reg_free() calls worry me slightly, but I assume they're safe... Yeah, that one's rather gross. Since Aurelien's generic div/rem patch I could simply remove all that millicode stuff, including that tcg_reg_free, and let the generic code handle this instead. Which would get to the same millicode routine via one or two extra levels of indirection. Thoughts? r~