From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Problem with absolute timeout
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:38:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA2813F.7040606@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1268919492.27899.362.camel@domain.hid>
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 14:29 +0100, Kolja Waschk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry for bothering the list with this probably silly problem, but I just don't have the right idea.
>>
>> The POSIX skin sem_timedwait() call doesn't wait!? I expected the following test code to take 2 seconds until it finishes (and that holds true on a PC), but instead, it returns immediately. What am I doing wrong here?
>>
>>
>> #include <errno.h>
>> #include <sys/time.h>
>> #include <semaphore.h>
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>> int r;
>> sem_t s;
>> struct timeval tv;
>> struct timespec ts;
>>
>> r = sem_init(&s, 0, 0);
>> if (r != 0) { perror("sem_init"); return errno; }
>>
>> r = gettimeofday(&tv, 0);
>> if (r != 0) { perror("gettimeofday"); return errno; }
>
> gettimeofday() is not the right time base for a Xenomai call. Try
> clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC/CLOCK_REALTIME...). CLOCK_MONOTONIC is
> faster if you don't require the returned time to be adjusted on the
> linux time.
There is no single rule for the POSIX API, some calls allow to use
CLOCK_REALTIME, some CLOCK_MONOTONIC, other to choose the clock, yet
other to use relative timings. For the case of sem_timedwait, you have
to use CLOCK_REALTIME, as documented here:
http://www.xenomai.org/documentation/xenomai-2.5/html/api/group__posix__sem.html#g8678e7f5136343ef8d8123a185878f78
>
>> // Same result with TIMEVAL_TO_TIMESPEC
>> ts.tv_sec = tv.tv_sec;
>> ts.tv_nsec = tv.tv_usec * 1000;
>>
>> ts.tv_sec += 2;
>>
>> r = sem_timedwait(&s, &ts);
>> if (r != 0) { perror("sem_timedwait"); return errno; }
>> }
>>
>> The result is always !0, errno = 110(ETIMEDOUT), immediately after starting.
>>
>> /tmp # time ./totest
>> sem_timedwait: Connection timed out
>> Command exited with non-zero status 110
>> real 0m 0.00s
>> user 0m 0.00s
>> sys 0m 0.00s
>>
>>
>> Test environment: Blackfin uClinux-dist 2009R1.1-RC4 (Xenomai 2.4.7, 2.6.28.10/I-Pipe 1.10.0)
>> but also tried and failed with Xenomai 2.5-rc4 in Kernel 2.6.31.6.
>>
>> Thanks for any hints!
>> Kolja
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xenomai-help mailing list
>> Xenomai-help@domain.hid
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-help
>
>
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-18 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-18 13:29 [Xenomai-help] Problem with absolute timeout Kolja Waschk
2010-03-18 13:38 ` Philippe Gerum
2010-03-18 19:38 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA2813F.7040606@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.