From: "Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner" <stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How to fix Current_Pending_Sector?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:22:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA32632.3050500@stud.tu-ilmenau.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87f94c371003181447w2147cb87h41d8b16613ee1471@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Greg,
Am 18.03.2010 22:47, schrieb Greg Freemyer:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:37 PM, David Rees <drees76@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Iain Rauch
>> <groups@email.iain.rauch.co.uk> wrote:
>>> The 'Current_Pending_Sector' was still 1, so I dd zero onto the whole drive.
>>> I guess I could have just done part of it, but I suppose that verified the
>>> whole drive 'works'. It only took ~5 hours. Funnily enough this did fix the
>>> Current_pending_sectors count back to zero. Still no error reports in the
>>> SMART data, and 'Reallocated_Event_Count' didn't go up - shouldn't that have
>>> gone up to one?
>>
>> No - the drive was able to successfully write to the sector it was
>> unable to read from. If the write had failed, it would have
>> reallocated the sector.
>>
>> -Dave
>
> Dave,
>
> Most sector writes are blind (ie. non-verified).
That is certainly right!
>
> Is your theory that if the sector is marked as a Pending_Bad_Sector a
> write is done, but it is verified, and a reallocate only occurs if the
> verify fails?
If the drives has noted errorneous behaviour on a sector (i.e. marked it
pending), it will try to resolve the problem by verify. It just only
makes sense that way, doesn't it?
>
> I've never heard that theory, but it makes great sense.
IC, it does ;)
>
> Greg
Stefan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-19 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-11 11:51 How to fix Current_Pending_Sector? Iain Rauch
2010-03-11 12:06 ` Michael Evans
2010-03-11 12:25 ` Iain Rauch
2010-03-11 16:54 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner
2010-03-15 11:20 ` Iain Rauch
2010-03-18 17:35 ` CoolCold
2010-03-18 19:37 ` David Rees
2010-03-18 21:47 ` Greg Freemyer
2010-03-19 7:22 ` Stefan /*St0fF*/ Hübner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA32632.3050500@stud.tu-ilmenau.de \
--to=stefan.huebner@stud.tu-ilmenau.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=st0ff@npl.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.