Re: Not sure if I sent this one out with the others but since it has not been updated yet...

[Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>]

On 03/19/2010 09:16 AM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 03/18/2010 04:22 PM, Joshua Brindle wrote:
>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>> Fixes libsepol.pc file.
>>>
>>> This looks like it was merged in commit
>>> 7420787817c4949276d7947202b49d78eba37c13 along with the libselinux and
>>> libsemanage pc.in changes. I didn't bump the version though, since it
>>> wasn't a code change.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>> Why? Are we running out of integers? I can not update with out a version
>> change.
>>
>
> We never really made a firm determination of what constitutes a 
> version bump, in the past I've used the does-it-change-the-code 
> metric, so man pages, Makefile changes, etc didn't get a bump.
>
> If it is a problem I can do it anytime there is a change.
>
> -- 
> This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to 
> majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
> the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
>
>
I would prefer, if there is a change to git, we bump the version.  Since 
I need to bump in order to release it in distribution.  My spec files 
say they are based on a particular version of upstream.

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.