All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:58:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA7A1C8.8050402@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1003200252060.762@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Wednesday 2010-03-17 14:35, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Normally, we would just use ip_local_out. Because iph->check is
>>> +	 * already correct, we could take a shortcut and call dst_output
>>> +	 * [forwards to ip_output] directly. ip_output however will invoke
>>> +	 * Netfilter hooks
>>>       
> [ok we can skip these with IPSKB_REROUTED]
>
>   
>>>         and cause reentrancy. So we skip that too and go
>>> +	 * directly to ip_finish_output.
>>>       
>
> And since we don't want fragmentation, we would need to call
> ip_finish_output2. That function is not exported, so it is copied. I
> am not even sure what the IPv4 layer does when it has to fragment a
> fragment (because fragments don't seem to carry IP_DF).
>   

I guess whether someone wants fragmentation is a question of the specific
use case. In many possible cases conntrack might have defragmented the
packet previously to reaching TEE, so it might actually be necessary to
refragment the packet.
> Setting IP_DF on the cloned skb could possibly lead to a Packet Too
> Big being sent back to the original sender - which should probably be
> avoided too.
>   

Indeed. This might also happen if the packet is passed through another
router of course.
>
> So removing the copied code does not look that easy.
>   
Well, worst case export the original function in case of duplicating it.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-22 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17 13:18 nf-next: checks and three modules Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] netfilter: xtables: do without explicit XT_ALIGN Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] netfilter: xtables: slightly more detailed checkentry return values Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:39   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:05     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:16       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:27         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:36           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:40             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 21:54               ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-18 11:14                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] netfilter: xtables: restrict TCPMSS to mangle table as intended Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:30   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:34     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:36       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] netfilter: xtables: clean up xt_mac match routine Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] netfilter: xtables: limit xt_mac to ethernet devices Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:31   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:37     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:40       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] netfilter: xtables: resort osf kconfig text Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:56   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:11     ` John Haxby
2010-03-17 14:43       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-20  1:47         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-22 15:14           ` John Haxby
2010-03-22 16:49             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 14:21     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 14:24       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:35   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:43     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-17 13:55       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23  1:55         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 11:57           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-26  2:39           ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-20  2:03     ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-22 16:58       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-03-22 17:45         ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 12:04           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 12:29             ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 12:38               ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 12:46                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-23 13:45                   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-17 13:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA7A1C8.8050402@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.