From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, hpa@zytor.com,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.cy
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:25:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA7EE72.7000507@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003222233440.3147@localhost.localdomain>
On 03/22/2010 03:09 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Yinghai,
>
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On 03/22/2010 12:37 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>>>> The main point is that there is still no answer why lmb cannot be used and
>>>> the reposted patch still is a full move of the x86 e820 functions into
>>>> kernel/fw_memmap.c.
>>>>
>>>> That's not a generalization, that's simply a relocation of x86 code to
>>>> kernel/. And I agree with Dave and Ben that this is an useless exercise.
>>>
>>> ok - i think you are right. Yinghai, mind having a look at using
>>> lib/lmb.c for all this?
>>
>> 1. need to keep e820
>
> That's neither an argument for using lmb nor an argument not to use
> lmb. e820 is x86 specific BIOS wreckage and it's whole purpose is
> just to feed information into a (hopefully) generic early resource
> management facility.
>
> e820 _CANNOT_ be generalized. Period.
>
>> 2. use e820 range with RAM to fill lmb.memory when finizing_e820
>
> What's finizing_e820 ???
finish_e820_parsing();
>
>> 3. use lmb.reserved to replace early_res.
>
> What's the implication of doing that ?
early_res array is only corresponding to lmb.reserved, aka reserved region from kernel.
>
>> current lmb is merging the region, we can not use name tag any more.
>
> What's wrong with merging of regions ? Are you arguing about a
> specific region ("the region") ?
>
> Which name tag ? And why is that name tag important ?
struct early_res {
u64 start, end;
char name[15];
char overlap_ok;
};
>
>> may need to dump early_memtest, and use early_res for bootmem at
>> first.
>
> Why exactly might early_memtest not longer be possible ?
early_memtest need to call find_e820_area_size
current lmb doesn't have that kind of find util.
the one memory subtract reserved memory by kernel.
>
> What means "early_res for bootmem" ?
use early_res to replace bootmem, the CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM.
that need early_res can be double or increase the slots automatically.
Yinghai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-22 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 111+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 7:13 [PATCH 00/20] x86: early_res and irq_desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 01/20] x86: add find_e820_area_node Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 02/20] x86: add get_centaur_ram_top Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 03/20] x86: make e820 to be static Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 04/20] x86: use wake_system_ram_range instead of e820_any_mapped in agp path Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 05/20] x86: make e820 to be initdata Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 2:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 2:46 ` Questions about SMP bootup control Zhu, Yijun (NSN - CN/Beijing)
2010-03-22 2:46 ` Zhu, Yijun (NSN - CN/Beijing)
2010-03-22 3:29 ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-22 3:29 ` Andi Kleen
2010-03-22 7:45 ` Zhu, Yijun (NSN - CN/Beijing)
2010-03-22 7:45 ` Zhu, Yijun (NSN - CN/Beijing)
2010-03-22 3:56 ` [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 4:00 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 4:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 4:33 ` David Miller
2010-03-22 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 11:30 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-03-22 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 21:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 21:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 21:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 22:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 18:18 ` [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.cy Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-22 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 20:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 21:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 22:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-22 22:25 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-03-22 22:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-22 23:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-23 0:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-23 1:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-23 1:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-23 6:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-23 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-23 9:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-23 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-24 4:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 4:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 5:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-24 7:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 18:37 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-24 9:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-24 9:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 9:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 4:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 6:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 20:47 ` [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from e820.c to fw_memmap.c Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-22 21:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-23 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-03-23 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-03-23 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-24 4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 5:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2010-03-24 5:47 ` Kyle Moffett
2010-03-22 21:57 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-03-22 21:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 21:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 5:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 6:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 7:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 07/20] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into struct irq_chip Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 08/20] x86: fix out of order of gsi - full Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 09/20] x86: set nr_irqs_gsi only in probe_nr_irqs_gsi Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 10/20] x86: kill smpboot_hooks.h Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 11/20] x86: use vector_desc instead of vector_irq Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 12/20] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc instead of irq -- x86 and core Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 13/20] genericirq: change ack/mask in irq_chip to take irq_desc instead of irq -- other arch Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 14/20] genericirq: add set_irq_desc_chip/data Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 15/20] x86/iommu/dmar: update iommu/inter_remapping to use desc Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 16/20] x86: use num_processors for possible cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 17/20] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 18/20] x86: remove arch_probe_nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 19/20] x86/pci: ioh new version read all at same time Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 16:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-03-22 16:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-03-22 16:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-03-22 19:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` [PATCH 20/20] x86/pci: add mmconf range into e820 for when it is from MSR with amd faml0h Yinghai Lu
2010-03-21 7:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-22 2:35 ` [PATCH 00/20] x86: early_res and irq_desc Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-22 3:26 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA7EE72.7000507@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.