From: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
To: rt2x00 Users List <users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com>
Cc: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>,
Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rt2x00-users] [PATCH RFC] rt2500usb: disable broken HW encryption by default
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:41:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA8E11A.2020300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201003231609.57505.linux@rainbow-software.org>
On 03/23/10 16:09, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2010, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ondrej Zary
>>
>> <linux@rainbow-software.org> wrote:
>>> On Monday 22 March 2010, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
>>>>>> But I though it was mentioned that disabling HW crypto didn't solve
>>>>>> the issue due to a second bug in a later kernel?
>>>>>
>>>>> That was a false positive. Probably because the device was not
>>>>> unplugged between the tests (and looks like the driver does not
>>>>> initialize the chip completely). It's not reliable, it sometimes stops
>>>>> working after reboot.
>>>>
>>>> Ah well that at least simplifies the problem. I'll have to retest
>>>> rt2500usb soon to see why the HW crypto failed. I am sure I had it
>>>> working for WEP, WPA and WPA2
>>>> before I submitted the patch.
>>>
>>> So let's try to fix it instead of disabling.
>>>
>>> First, the unrealiability (keeping HW encryption disabled). With the
>>> driver loaded but not doing anything more, the register dumps are same
>>> for both working and non-working case (dump-init.txt).
>>>
>>> dump-good-connected.txt is a dump after successful association and DHCP
>>> dump-bad-attempt.txt is a dump after successful association during
>>> non-working DHCP attempt
>>> dump-bad-after.txt is a dump after DHCP timed out
>>
>> With association working, but DHCP failing it most likely means that
>> somehow the frame was malformatted.
>> The code for HW crypto alters the frame (alters IV/EIV/ICV data etc).
>> And that is commonly the source of
>> problems, because what has to be done depends heavily on the encryption
>> type.
>>
>> So could you verify which of the encryption types (WEP,WPA,WPA2) is
>> failing or working? That would give a starting
>> position on which bytes might be corrupted.
>
> I was testing only with WPA2 before. I did some more testing today. The results:
>
> No encryption - works always
> WEP - sometimes works, sometimes not - same with and without HW encryption
> WPA - sometimes works, sometimes not - same with and without HW encryption
> WPA2 - never works with HW encryption
> - sometimes works, sometimes not without HW encryptionn
>
> So it seems that there are two problems:
> 1. random problems with any encryption
> 2. WPA2 is broken with HW encryption
>
> When the "random" problem appears, this appears in dmesg:
> wlan1: authenticate with 00:13:d4:0f:f3:17 (try 1)
> wlan1: authenticated
> wlan1: associate with 00:13:d4:0f:f3:17 (try 1)
> wlan1: RX AssocResp from 00:13:d4:0f:f3:17 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=2)
> wlan1: associated
> phy0 -> rt2500usb_set_device_state: Error - Device failed to enter state 3 (-16).
> phy0 -> rt2500usb_set_device_state: Error - Device failed to enter state 3 (-16).
> No probe response from AP 00:13:d4:0f:f3:17 after 500ms, disconnecting.
>
> Disabling call to rt2500usb_set_state() in rt2500usb_set_device_state() seems
> to fix problem 1. After this change, WEP and WPA work always regardless of
> HW encryption (and WPA2 works always without it).
>
For this last issue, could you check with powersaving disabled. Just execute
iwconfig wlan1 power off before associating.
The powersaving code looks a bit odd here, and we've had issues with this in the
other rt2x00 drivers as well.
---
Gertjan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-23 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-22 15:01 [PATCH RFC] rt2500usb: disable broken HW encryption by default Ondrej Zary
2010-03-22 15:10 ` [rt2x00-users] " Ivo Van Doorn
2010-03-22 15:30 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-22 15:40 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-03-23 9:27 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-23 9:36 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-03-23 15:09 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-23 15:15 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-03-24 13:12 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-24 13:24 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2010-03-24 14:52 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-26 11:05 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-31 21:39 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-23 15:41 ` Gertjan van Wingerde [this message]
2010-03-24 13:10 ` Ondrej Zary
2010-03-24 22:07 ` [PATCH] rt2500usb: improve powersaving reliability Ondrej Zary
2010-03-24 22:15 ` Ivo van Doorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BA8E11A.2020300@gmail.com \
--to=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.