From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Should journaled quota be default for ext4?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:30:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BAC3860.7010905@redhat.com> (raw)
Ted's email about quotacheck made me think:
Is there a reason that journaled quota is not default for ext4?
(or ext3 for that matter, but we're not messing with that now)
IOW - if we do mount -o quota, is there any reason that we should
also need more options to journal that quota? When would we not
want journaled quota?
(Forgive me if it's a dumb question, I'm not as well versed in
extN quota as I probably should be).
-Eric
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 4:30 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2010-03-26 14:26 ` Should journaled quota be default for ext4? tytso
2010-03-30 1:17 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-30 2:10 ` tytso
2010-03-30 2:24 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BAC3860.7010905@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.