From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:33:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB1FDC0.5020200@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330124815.GA6378@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 03:41:02PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> So it'd make more sense to nuke the hashes entirely for
>> per-socket policies?
>
> Absolutely.
I checked now the xfrm_user, and mostly it seems to prevent
modification to per-socket policies.
The only exception is XFRM_MSG_POLEXPIRE handler
xfrm_add_pol_expire(). It calls xfrm_policy_byid() without
verifying the direction, and can thus complete successfully on
a per-socket policy. This can actually result in per-socket
policy deletion via netlink.
I guess the proper thing is to add the direction check there.
It also seems that the by-index hash is also used when
generating new index. It's to double check that the index
is unique. So deleting the by-index hash from per-socket
policies seems tricky.
Removing bydst hashing should be trivial.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-30 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-29 14:12 [PATCH 0/7] caching bundles, iteration 2 Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfrm: remove policy lock when accessing policy->walk.dead Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:43 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 4:55 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 11:53 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:04 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:14 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:21 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:23 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:41 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:48 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 13:33 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2010-03-30 14:30 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:34 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:37 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 14:01 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 14:29 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 15:36 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-31 0:43 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] flow: structurize flow cache Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:02 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:15 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] flow: allocate hash table for online cpus only Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:12 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-31 12:32 ` Rusty Russell
2010-03-31 13:27 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] flow: delayed deletion of flow cache entries Timo Teras
2010-03-30 12:22 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:32 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-30 12:36 ` Herbert Xu
2010-03-30 12:43 ` Timo Teräs
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] flow: virtualize get and entry deletion methods Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfrm: cache bundles instead of policies for outgoing flows Timo Teras
2010-03-29 14:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfrm: remove policy garbage collection Timo Teras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB1FDC0.5020200@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.