From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slabh tree with the percpu tree Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:44:04 +0900 Message-ID: <4BB2B6F4.6010701@kernel.org> References: <20100330172253.de55195b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:35100 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752653Ab0CaCoI (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:44:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100330172253.de55195b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/30/2010 03:22 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Tejun, > > Today's linux-next merge of the slabh tree got a conflict in > include/linux/percpu.h between commit > 10fad5e46f6c7bdfb01b1a012380a38e3c6ab346 ("percpu, module: implement and > use is_kernel/module_percpu_address()") from the percpu tree and commit > d103d3b3e8512312b5254950035366d4422a479a ("percpu: don't implicitly > include slab.h from percpu.h") from the slabh tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Thanks. I'll soon push the stuff in percpu#for-next to mainline (they're fixes) and merge it into slabh. -- tejun