All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>, xiaosuo <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: rps: keep the old behavior on SMP without rps
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:28:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB2DD95.90402@gmail.com> (raw)

keep the old behavior on SMP without rps

RPS introduces a lock operation to per cpu variable input_pkt_queue on
SMP whenever rps is enabled or not. On SMP without RPS, this lock isn't
needed at all.

Signed-off-by: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
----
net/core/dev.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 3e7fa16..14ad3b7 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2314,13 +2314,19 @@ static int enqueue_to_backlog(struct sk_buff *skb, int cpu)
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	__get_cpu_var(netdev_rx_stat).total++;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 	spin_lock(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#endif
 	if (queue->input_pkt_queue.qlen <= netdev_max_backlog) {
 		if (queue->input_pkt_queue.qlen) {
 enqueue:
 			__skb_queue_tail(&queue->input_pkt_queue, skb);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock,
 			    flags);
+#else
+			local_irq_restore(flags);
+#endif
 			return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
 		}
 
@@ -2342,7 +2348,9 @@ enqueue:
 		goto enqueue;
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 	spin_unlock(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#endif
 
 	__get_cpu_var(netdev_rx_stat).dropped++;
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -2767,19 +2775,23 @@ int netif_receive_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_receive_skb);
 
 /* Network device is going away, flush any packets still pending  */
-static void flush_backlog(struct net_device *dev, int cpu)
+static void flush_backlog(void *arg)
 {
-	struct softnet_data *queue = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
+	struct net_device *dev = arg;
+	struct softnet_data *queue = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
 	struct sk_buff *skb, *tmp;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+	spin_lock(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#endif
 	skb_queue_walk_safe(&queue->input_pkt_queue, skb, tmp)
 		if (skb->dev == dev) {
 			__skb_unlink(skb, &queue->input_pkt_queue);
 			kfree_skb(skb);
 		}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock, flags);
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
+	spin_unlock(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#endif
 }
 
 static int napi_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -3092,14 +3104,22 @@ static int process_backlog(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
 	do {
 		struct sk_buff *skb;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 		spin_lock_irq(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#else
+		local_irq_disable();
+#endif
 		skb = __skb_dequeue(&queue->input_pkt_queue);
 		if (!skb) {
 			__napi_complete(napi);
 			spin_unlock_irq(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
 			break;
 		}
+#ifdef CONFIG_RPS
 		spin_unlock_irq(&queue->input_pkt_queue.lock);
+#else
+		local_irq_enable();
+#endif
 
 		__netif_receive_skb(skb);
 	} while (++work < quota && jiffies == start_time);
@@ -5549,7 +5569,6 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void)
 	while (!list_empty(&list)) {
 		struct net_device *dev
 			= list_first_entry(&list, struct net_device, todo_list);
-		int i;
 		list_del(&dev->todo_list);
 
 		if (unlikely(dev->reg_state != NETREG_UNREGISTERING)) {
@@ -5561,8 +5580,7 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void)
 
 		dev->reg_state = NETREG_UNREGISTERED;
 
-		for_each_online_cpu(i)
-			flush_backlog(dev, i);
+		on_each_cpu(flush_backlog, dev, 1);
 
 		netdev_wait_allrefs(dev);
 



             reply	other threads:[~2010-03-31  5:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31  5:28 Changli Gao [this message]
2010-03-31  5:40 ` rps: keep the old behavior on SMP without rps David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BB2DD95.90402@gmail.com \
    --to=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.