From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>,
davej@redhat.com, trenn@suse.de, linux@dominikbrodowski.net,
mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:42:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100330233851.17370621.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 03/30/2010 08:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> I've unilaterally decided that all six patches should be merged via the
> x86 tree, btw. They could be split between x86 and cpufreq, but I
> suspect there are interdependencies which would make that hard.
>
I would agree with that. I'll try to get them in tomorrow.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 13:39 [-v2 PATCH 0/6] powernow-k8: Core Performance Boost and effective frequency support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 1/6] x86, cpu: Add AMD core boosting feature flag to /proc/cpuinfo Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 2/6] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-30 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 3:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 3:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-31 6:42 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-03-31 15:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-31 15:16 ` Dave Jones
2010-04-09 20:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-09 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-04-08 9:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 3/6] x86: Unify APERF/MPERF support Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: Add APERF/MPERF support for AMD processors Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:39 ` [-v2 PATCH 5/6] powernow-k8: Fix frequency reporting Borislav Petkov
2010-03-26 13:40 ` [-v2 PATCH 6/6] cpufreq: Unify sysfs attribute definition macros Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB2EEE1.4010904@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.