From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: New release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 (RC9)
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:40:24 -0700
Message-ID: <4BB3B338.50000@goop.org>
References: <C7D95069.F5E4%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7D95069.F5E4%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/31/2010 11:18 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Ah right. Well, looks a bit scary this close to release and not clear to me
> that it's a regression. I suggest re-submit to xen-devel for inclusion in
> xen-unstable and possible backport for 4.0.1.
>    

I think it's fairly safe.  From a quick poke about, it appears to only 
affect guests which are using PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi, which is only new 
2.6.32+-based ones.

     J