From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: compute message size properly Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:50:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4BB47A6F.8000804@trash.net> References: <20100331151102.GB8043@psychotron.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com> <4BB38A8A.9050501@trash.net> <20100331182116.GB2822@psychotron.redhat.com> <1270060543.1931.20.camel@edumazet-laptop> <4BB47817.4060902@trash.net> <20100401104356.GD2879@psychotron.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100401104356.GD2879@psychotron.redhat.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, Krzysztof Oledzki Jiri Pirko wrote: > Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 12:40:23PM CEST, kaber@trash.net wrote: >> Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> Le mercredi 31 mars 2010 =E0 20:21 +0200, Jiri Pirko a =E9crit : >>>> Okay, I see your point. How about this: >>>> >>>> Subject: [net-next-2.6 PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: compute messag= e size properly V2 >>>> >>>> Message size should be dependent on net->ct.sysctl_acct, not on >>>> CONFIG_NF_CT_ACCT definition. >>>> >>> Then Changelog is not updated with the actual test :) >> I've fixed up the changelog and applied the patch, thanks. >=20 > Cand I ask on which tree? Since this doesn't confirm to Dave's definition of crucial fixes, I've applied it to nf-next-2.6.git :) git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html