From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jorrit Kronjee <j.kronjee@infopact.nl>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next-2.6] xt_hashlimit: RCU conversion
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:03:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BB47D81.3060400@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270038210.2103.23.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> xt_hashlimit uses a central lock per hash table and suffers from
> contention on some workloads. (Multiqueue NIC or if RPS is enabled)
>
> After RCU conversion, central lock is only used when a writer wants to
> add or delete an entry.
>
> For 'readers', updating an existing entry, they use an individual lock
> per entry.
Looks good to me, thanks Eric.
> -/* allocate dsthash_ent, initialize dst, put in htable and lock it */
> -static struct dsthash_ent *
> -dsthash_alloc_init(struct xt_hashlimit_htable *ht,
> - const struct dsthash_dst *dst)
Is there a reason for moving this function downwards in the file?
That unnecessarily increases the diff and makes the patch harder to
review. For review purposes I moved it back up, resulting in 42
lines less diff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-01 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-22 10:41 debugging kernel during packet drops Jorrit Kronjee
2010-03-22 17:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-22 17:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-22 18:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 15:14 ` Jorrit Kronjee
2010-03-23 15:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-23 17:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-23 20:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-24 15:20 ` Jorrit Kronjee
2010-03-24 16:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-24 16:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-24 17:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-24 17:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-25 9:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-25 10:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-25 11:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-31 12:23 ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6] xt_hashlimit: RCU conversion Eric Dumazet
2010-04-01 11:03 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-04-01 12:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-01 12:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-25 12:42 ` debugging kernel during packet drops Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-30 12:06 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-03-30 14:12 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-26 10:41 ` Jorrit Kronjee
2010-03-26 11:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-26 14:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-03-26 15:54 ` Jorrit Kronjee
2010-03-23 17:04 ` James King
2010-03-23 17:23 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BB47D81.3060400@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=j.kronjee@infopact.nl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.