From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NxMwl-0005AO-SI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:08:43 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48017 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxMwj-00058D-NS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:08:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NxMwh-00005Z-Rk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:08:41 -0400
Received: from mail-iw0-f199.google.com ([209.85.223.199]:60481)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NxMwh-00005O-OB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:08:39 -0400
Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so935629iwn.15
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BB4C503.1060400@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 11:08:35 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix features ack
References: <20100331182031.GA5200@redhat.com>
	<4BB393CF.1040700@codemonkey.ws>	
	<20100331153805.03ee142e@redhat.com>	
	<20100331190753.GA6914@redhat.com>
	<4BB3A183.8000905@codemonkey.ws>	
	<20100331224541.GB19306@hall.aurel32.net>	
	<4BB408CF.9040004@codemonkey.ws>
	<k2gf43fc5581004010854w9cc4624azde071378580a1db9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <k2gf43fc5581004010854w9cc4624azde071378580a1db9@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

On 04/01/2010 10:54 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 4/1/10, Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:
>    
>> On 03/31/2010 05:45 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>
>>      
>>> While it probably make sense to achieve this goal, it doesn't mean it
>>> should be done the dirty way.
>>>
>>> For example it is known for a lot of time that the solution for the
>>> bswap in the device code is to add a bus model doing the byteswapping.
>>> Removing the #ifdef by deciding "this device will only be big/little
>>> endian" doesn't seem to go in the right direction.
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>   Yeah, I'm having real trouble with the KVM regression.  I thought I had it
>> fixed but linux-user really made a mess of things.  There's no simple
>> solution that doesn't require quite a bit of refactoring which I'd rather do
>> in a less ugly way.  We've already been discussing getting rid of all the
>> kvm_enabled() stuff and I think doing that properly is going to be needed to
>> handle this correctly.
>>      
> Strange, does linux-user use kvm.h (indirectly)?
>    

Yes, because various things in target-i386 use kvm.h.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori