From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxRyq-0000Se-Jt for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:31:17 +0200 Received: (qmail 19500 invoked by uid 1003); 1 Apr 2010 21:27:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.1.167?) (philip@opensdr.com@127.0.0.1) by mail.geekisp.com with SMTP; 1 Apr 2010 21:27:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4BB50FD7.8010207@balister.org> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:27:51 -0400 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <1270135981.4993.128.camel@rex> <1270154092.6277.132.camel@trini-m4400> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 216.168.135.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: philip@balister.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: Koen Kooi Subject: Re: Request for branch merge X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:31:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/01/2010 05:08 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01-04-10 22:34, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 13:03 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Koen Kooiwrote: >>> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> On 01-04-10 17:33, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> >>>>> I could post the patches individually and get Acked lines for each one >>>>> but I'm hoping to avoid that and get permission to merge the branch >>>>> directly. We have talked about most of these things in one form or >>>>> another. >>>> >>>> I don't think this will get serious review people other than Tom, Khem >>>> and Chris, so if they don't have huge objections, merge it and we'll >>>> deal with the fallout together if needed. >>> >>> >>> I agree with Koen on this, it's a definite improvement. Let's get it merged >>> and deal with any fallout from there. >> >> Generally yes, and just a few things to hash out over the weekend I >> think. > > I'm going to steal Chris' thunder a bit, but during the TSC meeting we > agreed that "after the weekend" would be a better time to merge it than > "now". Dealing with the fallout required lots of attention, which boils > down to "office hours" for most of the involved. Thanks. I know the people who do work on OE over the weekends appreciate this. Philip