From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --nonetns switch to user-cr checkpoint Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:42:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4BB52F60.1050906@cs.columbia.edu> References: <1270046482-16053-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <4BB4240F.2030706@cs.columbia.edu> <87wrwrclv4.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87wrwrclv4.fsf-FLMGYpZoEPULwtHQx/6qkW3U47Q5hpJU@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Dan Smith Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Dan Smith wrote: > OL> I think the default behavior of 'checkpoint' should be to not > OL> chekcpoint net-ns, at the very least in the subtree-checkpoint > OL> case. > > OL> I prefer the container case to also not include it by default. > > OL> These can be tuned in the 'checkpoint' utility, or (better ?) > OL> by using CHECKPOINT_NETNS instead of CHECKPOINT_NONETNS... > > Okay, so you want to change NONETNS to NETNS and then make user-cr > have a positive flag instead of a negative one, yes? > please ;)