From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Hellstrom Subject: Re: unmappable vram V6 Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:23:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4BB9D65E.7090000@shipmail.org> References: <1269535044-17930-1-git-send-email-jglisse@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1269535044-17930-1-git-send-email-jglisse@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Jerome Glisse Cc: dri-devel@lists.sf.net List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Jerome Glisse wrote: > So in these patchset i use bool instead of atomic remove empty line > removal, and i hope addressed standing issues. Again only compile > tested for nouveau & vmwgfx. Tested this time only tested on RV710 > with special patch to force unmappable vram use. > http://people.freedesktop.org/~glisse/0014-TEST-UNMAPPABLE.patch > > Seems to work flawlessly (quake3, compiz, glxgears, firefox running > side by side) > > Cheers, > Jerome > > Jerome, Dave. Apart from a small fix in patch 12/13, I'm fine with this going in. Unfortunately I haven't had time to look at the Nouveau / Radeon patches, but the ttm- and vmwgfx patches look fine. Thanks, Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev --