From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz85e-0003Wd-8S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:41:10 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39031 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz85c-0003Vl-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:41:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz85Z-00083n-9D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:41:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz85Z-00083Y-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 08:41:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4BBB2BDE.4040500@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:41:02 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4BBA60CC.5050008@redhat.com> <2B33FC0A-344D-4A4D-8B2D-7E8FFBB038EF@suse.de> <4BBB2474.6010204@redhat.com> <4BBB2900.9010309@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4BBB2900.9010309@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: libvirt vs. in-qemu management List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel Developers On 04/06/2010 03:28 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> Note things like network setup are a bottomless pit. Pretty soon you >> need to setup vlans and bonding etc. If a user needs one of these and >> qemud doesn't provide it, then qemud becomes useless to them. But the >> same problem applies to libvirt. >> > If they are a bottomless pit then they are a bottomless pit. There's > nothing we can do about it. This pit needs to be dug either way, whether > it's in libvirt or in qemud. > Agreed. The only difference is who's doing the digging. One way to avoid it is to have a rich plugin API so if some needs some to, say, set up traffic control on the interface, they can write a plugin to do that. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function