From: Patrick Loschmidt <Patrick.Loschmidt@OEAW.ac.at>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH] corrected documentation for hardware time stamping
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:15:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBC6944.2090102@OEAW.ac.at> (raw)
From: Patrick Loschmidt <Patrick.Loschmidt@oeaw.ac.at>
The current documentation for hardware time stamping does not correctly specify the available kernel
functions since the implementation was changed later on.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Loschmidt <Patrick.Loschmidt@oeaw.ac.at>
---
--- Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt.orig 2010-04-07 12:52:47.000000000 +0200
+++ Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt 2010-04-07 11:43:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -41,11 +41,12 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SOFTWARE: return sy
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX/RX determine how time stamps are generated.
SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW/SYS determine how they are reported in the
following control message:
- struct scm_timestamping {
- struct timespec systime;
- struct timespec hwtimetrans;
- struct timespec hwtimeraw;
- };
+
+struct scm_timestamping {
+ struct timespec systime;
+ struct timespec hwtimetrans;
+ struct timespec hwtimeraw;
+};
recvmsg() can be used to get this control message for regular incoming
packets. For send time stamps the outgoing packet is looped back to
@@ -87,12 +88,13 @@ by the network device and will be empty
SIOCSHWTSTAMP:
Hardware time stamping must also be initialized for each device driver
-that is expected to do hardware time stamping. The parameter is:
+that is expected to do hardware time stamping. The parameter is defined in
+/include/linux/net_tstamp.h as:
struct hwtstamp_config {
- int flags; /* no flags defined right now, must be zero */
- int tx_type; /* HWTSTAMP_TX_* */
- int rx_filter; /* HWTSTAMP_FILTER_* */
+ int flags; /* no flags defined right now, must be zero */
+ int tx_type; /* HWTSTAMP_TX_* */
+ int rx_filter; /* HWTSTAMP_FILTER_* */
};
Desired behavior is passed into the kernel and to a specific device by
@@ -139,42 +141,56 @@ enum {
/* time stamp any incoming packet */
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL,
- /* return value: time stamp all packets requested plus some others */
- HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME,
+ /* return value: time stamp all packets requested plus some others */
+ HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME,
/* PTP v1, UDP, any kind of event packet */
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_PTP_V1_L4_EVENT,
-
- ...
+
+ /* for the complete list of values, please check
+ * the include file /include/linux/net_tstamp.h
+ */
};
DEVICE IMPLEMENTATION
A driver which supports hardware time stamping must support the
-SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl. Time stamps for received packets must be stored
-in the skb with skb_hwtstamp_set().
+SIOCSHWTSTAMP ioctl and update the supplied struct hwtstamp_config with
+the actual values as described in the section on SIOCSHWTSTAMP.
+
+Time stamps for received packets must be stored in the skb. To get a pointer
+to the shared time stamp structure of the skb call skb_hwtstamps(). Then
+set the time stamps in the structure:
+
+struct skb_shared_hwtstamps {
+ /* hardware time stamp transformed into duration
+ * since arbitrary point in time
+ */
+ ktime_t hwtstamp;
+ ktime_t syststamp; /* hwtstamp transformed to system time base */
+};
Time stamps for outgoing packets are to be generated as follows:
-- In hard_start_xmit(), check if skb_hwtstamp_check_tx_hardware()
- returns non-zero. If yes, then the driver is expected
- to do hardware time stamping.
+- In hard_start_xmit(), check if skb_tx(skb)->hardware is set no-zero.
+ If yes, then the driver is expected to do hardware time stamping.
- If this is possible for the skb and requested, then declare
- that the driver is doing the time stamping by calling
- skb_hwtstamp_tx_in_progress(). A driver not supporting
- hardware time stamping doesn't do that. A driver must never
- touch sk_buff::tstamp! It is used to store how time stamping
- for an outgoing packets is to be done.
+ that the driver is doing the time stamping by setting the field
+ skb_tx(skb)->in_progress non-zero. You might want to keep a pointer
+ to the associated skb for the next step and not free the skb. A driver
+ not supporting hardware time stamping doesn't do that. A driver must
+ never touch sk_buff::tstamp! It is used to store software generated
+ time stamps by the network subsystem.
- As soon as the driver has sent the packet and/or obtained a
hardware time stamp for it, it passes the time stamp back by
calling skb_hwtstamp_tx() with the original skb, the raw
- hardware time stamp and a handle to the device (necessary
- to convert the hardware time stamp to system time). If obtaining
- the hardware time stamp somehow fails, then the driver should
- not fall back to software time stamping. The rationale is that
- this would occur at a later time in the processing pipeline
- than other software time stamping and therefore could lead
- to unexpected deltas between time stamps.
-- If the driver did not call skb_hwtstamp_tx_in_progress(), then
+ hardware time stamp. skb_hwtstamp_tx() clones the original skb and
+ adds the timestamps, therefore the original skb has to be freed now.
+ If obtaining the hardware time stamp somehow fails, then the driver
+ should not fall back to software time stamping. The rationale is that
+ this would occur at a later time in the processing pipeline than other
+ software time stamping and therefore could lead to unexpected deltas
+ between time stamps.
+- If the driver did not call set skb_tx(skb)->in_progress, then
dev_hard_start_xmit() checks whether software time stamping
is wanted as fallback and potentially generates the time stamp.
next reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-07 11:15 Patrick Loschmidt [this message]
2010-04-08 4:53 ` [PATCH] corrected documentation for hardware time stamping David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBC6944.2090102@OEAW.ac.at \
--to=patrick.loschmidt@oeaw.ac.at \
--cc=loschmidt@fiss-oeaw.at \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrick.ohly@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.