From: Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: make ocfs2_adjust_resv_from_alloc simple.
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:47:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBD1974.9040203@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100407212423.GP11402@wotan.suse.de>
Mark Fasheh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 03:40:32PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>
>> When we allocate some bits from the reservation, we always
>> allocate from the r_start(see ocfs2_resmap_resv_bits).
>> So there should be no sense for checking between r_start
>> and start. And I don't think we will change this behaviour
>> somehow later by allocating from some bits after r_start.
>> Why not make ocfs2_adjust_resv_from_alloc simple now?
>>
>
> I wanted ocfs2_resmap_claimed_bits() to be able to accept as many types of
> input as possible. That way, it would stay ready to handle other types of
> bitmaps. You're correct however that it's not really practical to allow for
> allocation which would split our reservation.
>
> Btw, if we took this to it's logical conclusion I think we'd be able to get
> rid of the 'cstart' variable to ocfs2_resmap_claimed_bits(). It's good to at
> least track what the caller *thought* the start of the allocation was so
> IMHO we should leave that part of the api untouched.
>
yeah, I just want to change your codes as less as possible. ;)
>
> Can you please add a comment in reservations.h that
> ocfs2_resmap_claimed_bits() expects that 'start' is the same as we passed
> back from ocfs2_resmap_resv_bits(). Also, there's a check at the top of
> ocfs2_resmap_claimed_bits() which can become:
>
> BUG_ON(cstart != resv->r_start);
>
OK, I will add them and resend the patch.
Regards,
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-07 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-06 7:40 [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: make ocfs2_adjust_resv_from_alloc simple Tao Ma
2010-04-07 21:24 ` Mark Fasheh
2010-04-07 23:47 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2010-04-08 8:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] " Tao Ma
2010-04-23 21:44 ` Mark Fasheh
2010-04-23 22:03 ` Joel Becker
2010-04-26 6:45 ` Tao Ma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBD1974.9040203@oracle.com \
--to=tao.ma@oracle.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.