From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from p3plsmtpa01-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.82.87]) by linuxtogo.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzzP6-0006lQ-Uy for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 23:36:50 +0200 Received: (qmail 23867 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 21:33:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (209.242.7.187) by p3plsmtpa01-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (72.167.82.87) with ESMTP; 08 Apr 2010 21:33:21 -0000 Message-ID: <4BBE4B91.40602@mwester.net> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:33:05 -0500 From: Mike Westerhof User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <20100408162117.e7638f69.ospite@studenti.unina.it> <1270761657-18322-1-git-send-email-ospite@studenti.unina.it> In-Reply-To: <1270761657-18322-1-git-send-email-ospite@studenti.unina.it> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 72.167.82.87 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@mwester.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] glib-2.0: remove old glib-2.0-native recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:36:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Antonio Ospite wrote: > Having these around can cause some conflict in recipes depending on > recent glib-2.0-native, see [1]. > > What can happen is that, when no preferred versions are set (like in > DISTRO=minimal), bitbake picks up an older -native recipe even if a more > recent one using the BBCLASSEXTEND = "native" mechanism exists. > > [1] http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/540390/ > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite > --- > Please check if the commit message is clear enough, I think I've figured > out what's happening behind the scenes, but I have not that deep > knowledge of bitbake. > > Thanks, > Antonio Ospite > http://ao2.it > > > .../glib-gettextize-dir.patch | 11 -- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.12.4.bb | 49 ---------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.16.1.bb | 40 -------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.18.0.bb | 40 -------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.2.3.bb | 100 -------------------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb | 39 -------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.4.6.bb | 49 ---------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.6.5.bb | 51 ---------- > recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.6.6.bb | 51 ---------- > 9 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 430 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native-2.12.4/glib-gettextize-dir.patch > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.12.4.bb > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.16.1.bb > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.18.0.bb > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.2.3.bb > delete mode 100644 recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0-native_2.22.1.bb NACK. This glib version is still in use; don't delete it: /u/slug/slugos/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/glib-2.0-native-2.22.1-r6.2 (Surely there must a better way to fix this than removal of active recipes?) -Mike (mwester)