Re: [PATCH] branch: say "Reset to" in reflog entries for 'git branch -f' operations

[Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>]

Tay Ray Chuan venit, vidit, dixit 09.04.2010 15:45:
> In 5f856dd (fix reflog entries for "git-branch"), it is mentioned that
> 'git branch -f' is intended to be equivalent to 'git reset'. Since we
> usually say "reset to <commit>" in the git-reset Documentation and
> elsewhere, it would make sense to say "Reset to" here as well.
> 

I know the patch is not large, but one really has to read it after
wondering: Huh? What is branch -f doing now before the patch? To me it
sounded as if it didn't write to the reflog at all. So, how about

elsewhere, it would make sense to say "Reset to" here as well rather
than "Rest from".

But I also have a functional question: Is "start_from" really the ref
*to* which the branch is reset? I hope reset does it right.

> Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
>   I happened to be perusing my branch's reflog when I spotted this.
> 
>  branch.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/branch.c b/branch.c
> index 9e1f63e..2ab42aa 100644
> --- a/branch.c
> +++ b/branch.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ void create_branch(const char *head,
>  		log_all_ref_updates = 1;
> 
>  	if (forcing)
> -		snprintf(msg, sizeof msg, "branch: Reset from %s",
> +		snprintf(msg, sizeof msg, "branch: Reset to %s",
>  			 start_name);
>  	else if (!dont_change_ref)
>  		snprintf(msg, sizeof msg, "branch: Created from %s",
> --
> 1.7.1.rc0.240.gba75f
>