From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: nf-next: TEE/reentrancy 20100407 Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:53:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4BBF3F55.4050308@trash.net> References: <1270666217-27670-1-git-send-email-jengelh@medozas.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:60511 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753820Ab0DIOxK (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:53:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Wednesday 2010-04-07 20:50, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> Jan Engelhardt (6): >> netfilter: ipv6: move POSTROUTING invocation before fragmentation >> netfilter: ipv6: add IPSKB_REROUTED exclusion to NF_HOOK/POSTROUTING invocation >> netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE >> netfilter: xtables2: make ip_tables reentrant >> netfilter: xt_TEE: have cloned packet travel through Xtables too >> netfilter: xtables: remove old comments about reentrancy > > Is this submission ok? Not sure, I'm currently busy with other things. I'll review these patches this weekend.