All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moofie <moofie@shaw.ca>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Soltek K8T800Pro (it87-isa-0290),
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:30:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC02917.2090207@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BBA227C.7010205@shaw.ca>

Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:30:26 -0700, Moofie wrote:
>> Moofie wrote:
>>> Hello list, this is my first time posting here, and I come with some 
>>> questions about my server motherboard with the hopes that I configure 
>>> sensors on it correctly.
>>>
>>> While this Soltek board is relatively old (as the company is no longer 
>>> in business), I had never used it since the day that I bought it.  The 
>>> board was recently installed into a server role and I hope to monitor 
>>> its health from a distance.
>>>
>>> While sensors detects the correct chips installed on the board, the 
>>> values are useless.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if anyone can shed light on how to set the values 
>>> correctly for this board.  Here's some pertinent info:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ITE IT8712F, National LM90 (ISA 290h, SMBus 4Ch)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> acpitz-virtual-0
>>> Adapter: Virtual device
>>> temp1:       +40.0°C  (crit = +75.0°C)
>>>
>>> k8temp-pci-00c3
>>> Adapter: PCI adapter
>>> Core0 Temp:  +50.0°C
>>> Core1 Temp:  +42.0°C
>>>
>>> it87-isa-0290
> 
> This would be an IT8705F chip, not IT8712F as you wrote above.
> 

OK, I was going off of a forum post (one of a few about this specific 
motherboard, as the site is now unavailable, and finding information is 
scarce)

>>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>>> in0:         +1.31 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in1:         +2.54 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in2:         +3.28 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in3:         +2.90 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in4:         +2.91 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in5:         +0.96 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in6:         +1.12 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> in7:         +2.94 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +4.08 V)
>>> Vbat:        +3.26 V
>>> fan1:       11250 RPM  (min = 3245 RPM)
>>> fan2:       4963 RPM  (min =    0 RPM)
>>> temp1:       +26.0°C  (low  =  -1.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = 
>>> thermistor
>>> temp2:       -86.0°C  (low  =  -1.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = 
>>> thermal diode
>>> temp3:       +14.0°C  (low  =  -1.0°C, high = +127.0°C)  sensor = 
>>> thermistor
>>>
>>> lm90-i2c-0-4c
>>> Adapter: SMBus Via Pro adapter at 5000
>>> temp1:       +38.0°C  (low  =  +0.0°C, high = +70.0°C)
>>>                       (crit = +85.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)
>>> temp2:       +63.1°C  (low  =  +0.0°C, high = +70.0°C)
>>>                       (crit = +85.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)
>>>
>>>
>>> If I can provide more information, let me know.
>> I have been playing with the values and I feel that I have made some 
>> progress.  Identifying the sensors is difficult as they all seem to show 
>> different patterns.
>>
>> Under it87, temp1 is almost constant, it hovers around 26C, currently 
>> it's at 24C and I've seen it go as high as 27C.  Using stress (with all 
>> the different hogs), the temperature does climb, but not right away and 
>> this leads me to believe that this is indeed a sensor and it monitors 
>> the ambient/case temperature.
>>
>> temp2 is a negative value and stays constant within a 3 degree range if 
>> set to a thermal diode, if set to thermistor it seems to stay constant 
>> at negative 55.  This is all throughout multiple stress runs, both 
>> memory, i/o, disk and CPU.  I'm assuming that this sensor is not connected.
>>
>> temp3 swings wildly from -110 to about 108 degrees, and all over in 
>> between.  I've tried setting it as a thermistor or diode, and it still 
>> goes all over the place.  I'm wondering what I can do with this sensor 
>> as it's not really reading correctly.  It must be sensing something, as 
>> it does produce values all over the range, I'm just stumped as to what 
>> kind of compute function I would need to use to make this thing make any 
>> kind of sense.
> 
> If it jumps all over the place no matter the setting, then you can
> safely conclude that it is left floating and should be disabled/ignored.
> 

I visited your site and found a few examples that said the manufacturer 
left the sensor floating.  I was unaware as to what that meant exactly. 
  Thanks for letting me know.  I have now disabled all three temperature 
readings.

>> I will further ask questions about the rest of the detected chips as I 
>> get to them, though I'd appreciate any thoughts on the above temperature 
>> sensors.
> 
> Given that the board vendor used a dedicated LM90 temperature
> monitoring chip to track the CPU temperature, I wouldn't be surprised
> if most or all of the IT8705F temperatures inputs were left unused. The

I was getting that feeling through my many attempts at computing the values.

> it87 driver forcibly enables temperature monitoring channels if they
> are found all disabled when the driver is loaded. It probably shouldn't
> do that, especially given that each channel can be configured in two
> different modes (thermistor and thermal diode) and the driver has no
> way to know which mode would be correct. Incidentally, your modes
> configuration for temp1, temp2 and temp3 matches the arbitrary default
> set by the it87 driver, so it is possible that all sensors were indeed
> disabled originally.
> 

OK, understood.

> I will fix the it87 driver later today to no longer arbitrarily enable
> temperature sensors. This should clear some confusion as least on some
> boards.
>
> What temperatures are reported by the BIOS on this machine? This would
> be a valuable hint.
> 

The BIOS reports that CPU temp is at 60C and that SYS temp is at 20C.

I've run across a few posts about the CPU temperature reported via the 
windows utility and the bios reports as being off.  I know the 
manufacturer released a BIOS revision after mine, though unfortunately 
it's quite buggy and most of the people who ran/run this board 
downgraded back to the version I'm running.

I've guessed at the second temperature that the LM90 reports and used a 
calculate formula to reduce the reading by 10% as 60C is very high for 
an undervolted Opteron 165.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-10  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-05 17:48 [lm-sensors] Soltek K8T800Pro (it87-isa-0290), Moofie
2010-04-08 23:30 ` Moofie
2010-04-08 23:50 ` Moofie
2010-04-09  7:24 ` Jean Delvare
2010-04-09  7:59 ` Jean Delvare
2010-04-10  7:30 ` Moofie [this message]
2010-04-10  7:35 ` Moofie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BC02917.2090207@shaw.ca \
    --to=moofie@shaw.ca \
    --cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.