From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:33:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC49CE9.4020606@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1004131816070.7914@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2010-04-13 18:09, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>> +#ifdef WITH_CONNTRACK
>>>> + nf_conntrack_put(skb->nfct);
>>>> + skb->nfct = &tee_track.ct_general;
>>>> + skb->nfctinfo = IP_CT_NEW;
>>>> + nf_conntrack_get(skb->nfct);
>>>> +#endif
>>> Why do we still need this? I thought the reentrancy-counter should take
>>> care of this?
>> Did I really delete that commit... it's done so that conntrack
>> does not count the duplicated packets towards the original
>> connection.
>
> While at that, would retaining the old skb's nfctinfo make any sense?
I don't think so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-13 12:37 nf-next: reentrancy, new modules Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] netfilter: ipv6: move POSTROUTING invocation before fragmentation Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 13:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] netfilter: ipv6: add IPSKB_REROUTED exclusion to NF_HOOK/POSTROUTING invocation Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 13:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 13:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 13:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_TEE Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 13:37 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 13:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 16:09 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 16:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 16:33 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2010-04-13 16:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 17:28 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 17:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 4/8] netfilter: xtables2: make ip_tables reentrant Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 5/8] netfilter: xt_TEE: have cloned packet travel through Xtables too Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 6/8] netfilter: xtables: remove old comments about reentrancy Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 12:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_condition Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-13 13:26 ` nf-next: reentrancy, new modules Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BC49CE9.4020606@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.