From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: future plans for libxl?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:52:04 +0200
Message-ID: <4BC5E4A4.8000504@redhat.com>
References: <4BC578DF.9000508@amd.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1004141637250.7041@kaball-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1004141637250.7041@kaball-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 04/14/2010 05:48 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Even though xend will be ported to libxenlight, xl is going to be
> smaller and well tested, therefore we encourage people that don't need
> advanced xend features, like managed domains or the XML RPC interface,
> to use xl.

Why not use libvirt for managed domains, and deprecate the XML RPC 
interface in favor of the libvirt RPC?

Paolo